NO INCOME TAX LAW FORMER “IRS” AGENT JOE BANNISTER PART 1

stihlman37 asked:


Joe Bannister explains in a interveiw the 2 year investigation he did, resulted in the IRS forcing him to resign.

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

JohnDobySCREENWRITER March 17, 2009 at 6:24 pm

So what do we do about this? TAX REVOLT NOW!

KevinMerck March 18, 2009 at 6:12 pm

The income tax is patently unconstitutional.

See “Larkin Rose” – “Theft by Deception”.

It’s an excellent documentary that explains the *fraud* very effectively.

People need to stop living in fear of their own government. The Supreme Court has already decided that the Sixteenth Amendment gives the government no new powers of taxation.

When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty.

-Thomas Jefferson

almartin77 March 18, 2009 at 7:35 pm

The income tax is constitutional. However that does not mean the tax is imposed on your right to earn a living. Depending on the nature of the activity you are engaged in to earn your living in. The tax may or may not apply. The only question here is whether or not there is a clearly laid provision of statutory “liability” that applies to you. All taxes share 3 elements. 1. What is taxed. 2. How much tax. and 3. Who is “LIABLE” for the tax. All 3 elements must be there for the tax to be valid.

almartin77 March 22, 2009 at 2:22 am

Income taxes and “employment” taxes are two separate species of tax. “Employment” taxes involve participation in Federal Entitlement programs such as Old-age, survivors, and disability insurance and are “voluntary”. These taxes are imposed in subtitle C of title 26. Not subtitle A. You may wish to use your computer to research 20 CFR 404.1001 et seq. for definitions. § 3102. § 3202. and § 3403 make the employer “liable” for Subtitle C taxes. Not the employee.

KevinMerck March 24, 2009 at 11:15 pm

–”When your payer has a w-2 on file, the government assumes your earnings are wages and taxable income. So, you are then legally required to file a 1040 because it is already assumed you are a person required to file.”

No offence intended, but that entire statement quoted above is completely ludicrous.

However, everyone should do their own research. Watch the excellent documentary “Freedom to Fascism” to get a better understanding of the issue. Also check out “Theft by Deception”.

eklypse0 March 26, 2009 at 3:34 am

[You simply need the money now, not at the end of the year. Then just don't file a 1040.]

There is a problem with your ‘solution’. When your payer has a w-2 on file, the government assumes your earnings are wages and taxable income. So, you are then legally required to file a 1040 because it is already assumed you are a person required to file.

Instead, correct your information with the IRS, stating that it was a non-taxable activity.

Read-
Cracking The Code
By: Eric Hendrickson

KevinMerck March 27, 2009 at 4:20 am

Every cop and public official should be as honest as Joe Banister and Sherry Jackson. The income tax is unconstitutional and only the misinformed argue otherwise. Study the subject the way Joe and Sherry did to reach your own conclusion.

To stop paying simply file exempt and tell your employer that you will owe nothing at the end of the year because of your many deductions. Tell them you have it all worked out with tax professionals and that it’s perfectly legal.

KevinMerck March 30, 2009 at 3:46 pm

You simply need the money now, not at the end of the year. Then just don’t file a 1040.

Sixty odd million legally do this. The Supreme Court has already made the decision that the sixteenth amendment gives the government no new powers of taxation. Watch the documentary “Freedom to Fascism” to understand the issue better.

This is about preserving our Republic. If you fancy yourself as someone who cares about our country and its citizens, here is your chance to prove it.

adambomb805 April 2, 2009 at 9:55 am

if u haven’t heard of ALEX JONES then u need to listen up more.

selfactingmachine April 3, 2009 at 1:53 am

alex jones?

ifreemantoo April 3, 2009 at 4:38 pm

Proven Liar & Legal thief thetacodeisthelaw aka bedesquire this is your second notice regarding the lie you’ve posted twice.

Once again correct your misrepresentation of my words & statements. I don’t have to defend something I never said.

PROVE IT, that I said Napolitano said your lie or that I wrote your lie?

PROVE IT we’re waiting…

and waiting…

and waiting…

If not subject to law I’m certainly not subject to your mischief either.

PROVE YOUR ASSUMPTION

ifreemantoo April 6, 2009 at 8:23 am

Proven liar bedesquire aka thetaxcodeisfruad, I never said the income tax was unconstitutional. I never said that Napolitano said the tax law was unconstitutional.

PROVE IT. Where have I said, the income tax is unconstitutional or that Napolitano said same?

Of course you NEVER PROVED Barry Smith of LEGALBEARS*COM used old failed tax argument nor the rest of the lies you made.

You’re just up to more tryin’ with your lyin’ & I ain’t buyin’.

THETAXCODEISTHELAW April 8, 2009 at 2:15 am

Judge Andrew Napolitano never said you dont have to pay taxes. He never said the tax system violates the Constitution. Please show me one quote of his regarding taxation.

ifreemantoo April 10, 2009 at 5:44 am

Bedesquire aka thetaxcodeisfraud you’re just tryin’ with your’ lyin again.

Such gibberish from a pathetic wannabe legal thief. Any one can type in “color of law” on a search engine and obtain several “legal” definitions if for instance I misplaced my Blacks law dictionary.

Since you obviously don’t understand basic law terms your completely out of your element.

ifreemantoo April 11, 2009 at 1:34 pm

Proven liar bedesquire aka thetaxcodeisfruad, I never said the income tax was unconstitutional. I never said that Napolitano said the tax law was unconstitutional.

PROVE IT. Where have I said, the income tax is unconstitutional or that Napolitano said same?

Of course you NEVER PROVED Barry Smith of LEGALBEARS*COM used old failed tax argument nor the rest of the lies you made.

You’re just up to more tryin’ with your lyin’ & I ain’t byin’.

THETAXCODEISTHELAW April 12, 2009 at 12:37 am

Andrew P. Napolitano NEVER said you dont have to pay your taxes or that the tax law is unconstitutional and he NEVErsupported any of the crazy tax protester theories. He would laugh in your face , if you told him your crazy tax theories.

THETAXCODEISTHELAW April 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm

You seem obssessed with the phrase “color of law”. You never respond to anyones facts , but just throw that phrase around. I dont think you even know what it means. When the IRS throws you in jail, then you can complain about your lack of freedom. I love living in a free country where i can vote & express my opinions freely-. You dont. Are you even an American? Why dont you go to law school , becomea lawyer, or a politician &change the laws.

hardwaterwalleye April 14, 2009 at 4:46 am

Google and read….

A Letter to Armen Condo.

Armen Condo ran the largest tax protest group in American history. 30,000 members at its peak.

ifreemantoo April 15, 2009 at 12:50 am

[You think you have rights that are guaranteed? Well think again.'
'The government is simply stretching and twisting federal law & the Constitution in whatever way it sees fit for whatever contemporary need it may have.']

So bedesquire aka theincometaxcodeisthelaw when you speak of freedom you mean the freedom by color law to legally steal from and harm the people.

What credentials do you have compared to respected former Judge Andrew Napolitano? Or are you just a wannabe legal thief?

ifreemantoo April 16, 2009 at 12:47 am

Here are some more facts you’ll never hear from legal thieves. Former Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote in his book CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS,

Because the government breaks the law and denies it, the government is not your friend.

Content of Part 1
Rights and Liberties

Chapters
1 Breaking the law to enforce it
2 Attacking the Innocent
3 Creating Crime
4 Grabbing Guns, Endangering Citizens
5 Filching Property
6 Gagging Free Speech
7 Bribing Witnesses, Buying Convictions
8 Assaulting the People

ifreemantoo April 18, 2009 at 4:13 pm

Truths you’ll never hear from Legal Thieves. Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote in his book CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS,

‘Because it breaks the law, the government is not your friend…after witnessing first-hand how the criminal justice system works to subvert and shred the Constitution. You think you have rights that are guaranteed? Well think again.’
‘The government is simply stretching and twisting federal law & the Constitution in whatever way it sees fit for whatever contemporary need it may have.’

ifreemantoo April 19, 2009 at 2:31 am

LEGAL THIEF & PROVEN LIAR BEDESQUIRE aka THETAXCODEISTHELAW,

Your just pathetic now. I mean how ridiculous are you to repeat the same stupid arguments as if another person. You just joined today. LOL

THETAXCODEISTHELAW April 22, 2009 at 3:49 am

Why do refuse to tell Bedequire what he won, what pointshe won, or how he won? Every tax lawyer I speak to , without exception, says that tax protstors arguments are nonsense. Why are they always going to jail, if they are right? Have you ever spoken to a tax lawyer about these issues? No expert agrees with any of these tax protester arguments. All of these tax protsters are scammers who want gullible uneducated people whodont know any better, to buy their books & courses.

ifreemantoo April 23, 2009 at 2:30 pm

[I havent the slightest idea who Barry Smith is.]

Then you shouldn’t misrepresent someone’s reputation/position when you don’t know of him either.

You just used the, “even if he did..” argument which only means now that YOU’RE A PROVEN LIAR & also a mischief maker. By using these words you now agree that for all your misdirection you now confirm that in fact that;

1 Barry Smith of LEGALBEARS*COM IS not “repeating old tired arguments”.

2 He wins without going to court.

3 He won many points.

ifreemantoo April 26, 2009 at 7:00 pm

Just the same proven lie repeated by PROVEN LIAR BEDESQUIRE.

Restating the first lie differently is still a lie. He failed to correct the lie.

You just used the, “even if he did…” argument which only means now that YOU’RE A PROVEN LIAR & also a mischief maker. By using these words you now agree that for all your misdirection you now confirm that in fact that;

1 Barry Smith of LEGALBEARS*COM IS not “repeating old tired arguments”.

2 He wins without going to court.

3 He won many points.

Leave a Comment

*

Previous post:

Next post: