Income Tax Propaganda Cartoon

{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }

calchexas March 13, 2009 at 10:11 am

Exact opposite type of propaganda to this, though: the _last_ thing Fox news wants you to do is pay the income tax.

djnovak8706 March 15, 2009 at 1:15 am

I used to watch this cartoon when I was little, now rewatching it, there is a crap of propaganda.

GothicHorror10 March 17, 2009 at 11:36 pm

they play the English national anthem at the end

Long live the queen
Rule Britannia

aweiss March 20, 2009 at 1:12 am

dumbest thing I have ever heard. Do you think before you type that ****?

godofmars March 24, 2009 at 1:15 pm

propaganda it is.

aweiss March 24, 2009 at 7:24 pm

We have propaganda today? Where?

B3WorldPictures March 25, 2009 at 6:06 pm

At least the “good” duck was a Scot. but then again, he may have been the bad duck. But in all seriousness, wow, what a find…..great clip.

brainerdrebel March 28, 2009 at 8:07 pm

Income Tax doesn’t pay for wars or run the Union. Our Income Tax pays interest to the privately owned Federal Reserve for printing worthless fiat currency.

FahhhhhQ March 31, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Well, we were in a REAL war back then. And, apparently, nobody had thought up withholding.

dooleee April 1, 2009 at 4:47 am

wow more and more i discover how overtly obvious propaganda was in the past. This cartoon is incredibly bold compared to today’s. Thank you the ever docile masses. Simply A-mazing!

hardwaterwalleye April 2, 2009 at 6:55 pm

Google and read….

A Letter to Armen Condo.

Armen Condo ran the largest tax protest group in American history. 30,000 members at its peak.

Patrickisreallygreat April 3, 2009 at 3:36 am

Propaganda is pretty common in almost every country in the World. It has been around much before ******.

thenewbuttface88 April 4, 2009 at 9:18 pm

I’ll definitely look into that.

FreedomFightersUnion April 7, 2009 at 7:21 am

think again, every state, one by one.. check it out every month theres another state gun ban

thenewbuttface88 April 7, 2009 at 10:43 am

Also, I don’t think there will be any gun ban in this country any time soon, most Democrats and Republicans would be against something like that, and even if Obama would want to ban guns, he most likely wouldn’t attempt to do something like that because of how much it would cost him politically.

thenewbuttface88 April 8, 2009 at 12:00 am

I don’t know what that has to do with Bush, but what bill are you talking about? I don’t think the president can do that.

eklypse0 April 11, 2009 at 8:29 am

OK. You don’t mind that Obama’s staff is trying to eventually cause all firearms to be banned to the civilians?

The FEMA camps that are in operation. It’s interesting that if such camps are supposed to be for relief from natural disasters, why are they chain linked, gated for one way directions (like a prison), and barb wire topped?

Why did he REQUIRE congress to vote on a 1000+ page bill only an hour after they got it? He threaten economic disaster if they didn’t vote it to go though?

thenewbuttface88 April 13, 2009 at 12:53 am

I think he has a lot of differences, like when it comes to taxes, the economy, civil liberties, iraq, afghanistan, healthcare, etc. you make it sound like just because we didn’t vote bush out (which i agree we should’ve, unfortunately i was 15) we live in a dictatorship or might as well live in one. I don’t think that makes a lot of sense.

eklypse0 April 14, 2009 at 6:12 pm

Like we voted out Bush? He was an idiot at the beginning of his reign, and _somehow_ continued after his first terrible term into the second. Then we Get Obama, who was for _change_ but he isn’t that much different from Bush.

thenewbuttface88 April 15, 2009 at 9:52 pm

Then we can just vote em out.

bluntlicious April 16, 2009 at 8:50 am

60,000 x 300 million is 18 trillion, not 1 trillion.

eklypse0 April 19, 2009 at 3:10 pm

The government big enough to give you what you want, is big enough to take away everything.

thenewbuttface88 April 21, 2009 at 10:40 am

Are you not aware that almost every country in the world has an economy involving elements of both socialism and capitalism? I’m not sure if the United States has ever had a totally capitalist system, although we did used to be much closer to that way of doing things, and when we were, there were no child labor or minimum wage laws, and there was much more poverty and inequality between the rich and the poor, that peeked at the beginning of the depression, and peaked again at the start of this.

mattgeb84 April 23, 2009 at 3:28 am

ron paul helped wake up the nation

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: